vs Askority vs Doing it by hand

Your spreadsheet was right. It just cannot keep up

Most teams start GEO the honest way: a list of prompts, six browser tabs, a spreadsheet and someone's Friday afternoon. It proves the channel matters. It cannot tell you why a number moved, and it stops the week that person is on holiday.

14-day trial. All 6 engines on every plan. No card needed.
Askority vs Doing it by hand at a glance
Competitor details verified against public pricing pages and third-party reviews in August 2026. Prices may have changed; check the vendor's site before deciding.
Feature Doing it by hand Askority
Cost
Better:One person, a few hours a week
From $79 / mo
Engines checked
As many tabs as you open
Better:All 6, automatically
Runs per prompt per day
1, when someone remembers
Better:4 / 12 / 24
Prompts you can keep up with
10 to 30
Better:50 to 600
History
Whatever was pasted
Better:3 months to unlimited, every answer stored
Noise handling
A screenshot is the data
Better:Confidence labels on every move
Citations tracked
Rarely
Better:Every source, every run
Why it changed
A hunch
Better:Drop diagnostics with the page that started being cited
What to do next
A meeting
Better:Action queue with forecasts and drafts
Proof in GA4
Manual referrer filter
Better:Automatic, by engine, region and URL
Flexibility
Better:Anything you can imagine
What the product does
Runs while on holiday
No
Better:Yes
The hidden cost

Three hours a week is 150 hours a year

Checking 20 prompts on six engines takes an afternoon. Doing it daily is a part-time job. And the person doing it is usually the one who should be writing the content that fixes the gaps.

Doing it by hand
Manual checks, when there is time.
Askority
Automatic, up to 24 runs a day.
The noise problem

Two screenshots can disagree, and both are right

Answers vary run to run. A spreadsheet with one cell per day cannot tell a bad sample from a real drop, so teams either panic at noise or ignore a loss.

Doing it by hand
One sample, no confidence.
Askority
Many samples, labelled stable / low sample / real drop.
The why

The spreadsheet records that it fell. It cannot say why

Askority compares cited sources before and after a drop, names the page that took your slot and opens the matching action, then attributes results in GA4.

Doing it by hand
A number went down.
Askority
Root cause, action, GA4 proof.
Who is it for

Pick the one that fits the team you have

Choose Askority if
  • You have more than 20 prompts or more than one brand.
  • Someone has asked "why did this drop?" and nobody could answer.
  • You need the check to happen without you.
Choose Doing it by hand if
  • You track fewer than ten prompts and check them monthly.
  • You are testing whether AI answers matter for your category at all.
  • Budget is zero and time is free.

Askority vs Doing it by hand: questions

Can I import my existing spreadsheet?

Yes. Import prompts from CSV in the Add brand wizard. Historical rows cannot be imported because they were not collected the same way, but you can keep the sheet for reference.

Can I still export everything?

Yes. Prompts, executions, citations and attribution export to CSV on every plan.

What if I only need a one-off check?

Start the 14-day trial, add your prompts and download the report. No card is needed and the account goes read-only after the trial.

See both side by side on your own prompts

Add your brand, import your prompt list and compare the first report with what you have today.

Start for free