vs
Askority vs Profound
Enterprise depth without the enterprise contract
Profound is the category's best-known platform, built for Fortune 500 AEO teams. Its self-serve tiers track one to three engines; Claude, Gemini and Copilot sit behind an Enterprise contract. Askority gives all six engines, diagnostics and GA4 attribution on a monthly plan.
| Feature | Profound |
Askority |
|---|---|---|
| Entry plan | $99 / mo, billed yearly | Better:$79 / mo, billed monthly |
| Engines on the entry plan | ChatGPT only | Better:All 6 |
| Engines on the mid plan | 3 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) at $399 / mo | Better:All 6 at $249 / mo |
| Max engines | Better:Up to 9-10 on Enterprise | 6 |
| Prompts on entry / mid plan | 50 / 100 | Better:50 / 200 |
| Team seats | 1 / 3, more on Enterprise | Better:Unlimited |
| Runs per prompt per day | Daily refresh | Better:4 / 12 / 24 with confidence labels |
| Prompt volumes | Better:Panel data from opted-in consumers (Enterprise) | Estimated from engine and search data, every plan |
| Drop diagnostics with root cause | No | Better:Yes |
| GA4 attribution to exact URLs | Agent Analytics (crawler focus) | Better:Sessions and conversions by engine, region, URL |
| Content | AEO articles per month, Agents automation | Drafts from lost prompts, URL optimization |
| Site audit for AI crawlers | Agent Analytics | Per-URL audit with 200 / 403 per bot |
| SSO and SOC 2 | Better:SSO and SOC 2 on Enterprise | SSO on Scale |
| Trial | 7 days (Growth) | Better:14 days, no card |
Six engines for $79, not three for $399
Profound's ladder is a coverage ladder: $99 buys ChatGPT, $399 buys three engines, everything else is a sales call. If your buyers use Gemini or Claude, you cannot see them without Enterprise.
A drop with a cause, not a drop with a dashboard
Profound stores answers over time and shows the trend well. What it does not do is name the competitor page that started being cited and link it to the fix. Askority marks the drop, lists the engine deltas and prompts lost, and opens the matching action.
From AI answer to session to conversion
Profound's Agent Analytics is about crawler behaviour. Askority connects to GA4 and attributes sessions and conversions by engine, region and the exact landing URL, so the report ends in revenue, not in share of voice.
Pick the one that fits the team you have
Choose Askority if- You want all six major engines on a monthly plan without a sales call.
- You need to know why visibility moved and what to do next, on one screen.
- You have to show AI traffic and conversions in GA4 by page.
Choose Profound if- You are an enterprise team with a dedicated AEO owner and budget for a custom contract.
- You need nine or more engines including Grok, Meta AI or DeepSeek.
- Prompt Volumes panel data with demographics is core to your research.
Askority vs Profound: questions
Is Profound better than Askority?
Profound is the more complete enterprise platform: more engines at the top tier, consumer panel data and an agents layer. Askority is built for teams that want six engines, diagnostics and attribution on a monthly plan without procurement.
Can I migrate my prompt list from Profound?
Yes. Export prompts to CSV and import them in the Add brand wizard; topics and tags come with them.
Does Askority have Prompt Volumes?
Yes, on every plan. Our volumes are estimated from engine and search signals rather than a consumer panel, so treat them as relative demand rather than an audience census.
See both side by side on your own prompts
Add your brand, import your prompt list and compare the first report with what you have today.
Start for free